On 2 Mar 2005, at 12:39, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
I'd like to add-on to Spencer's point...
At 6:14 AM -0600 3/2/05, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
- Most important - we expect people to read the drafts before
discussing them at face-to-face meetings, and thought that
considering drafts submitted this morning didn't give working groups
enough time to do necessary homework before having really confused
and confusing discussions
Having the draft available two weeks in advance does very little good
if the WGs don't have agendas posted that tell you what drafts to read
in preparation for the meeting.
At this point, less than one week before the meeting, only 14 WGs (not
counting BOFs) have agendas posted. I'm at a loss for a suitable
adjective.
You might start by asking the secretariat why all the agendas which
have been submitted haven't been posted... I know of two working groups
which have sent in their agenda that don't appear on the website, and I
suspect they're not the only ones.
Colin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf