on 2005-06-16 01:53 Henning Schulzrinne said the following:
Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. However it requires direct integration with the
tracker, which means that the tools team can't just put up a prototype,
Not really - one could associate the WGLC with just the draft name, and
use that name as the key into the tracker. A similar approach could be
used to track charter deadlines.
That won't feed the WGLC information into the tracker, which was the
most salient point of Jeffrey's idea, I thought. Without that, you're
left with something close to what I first described.
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf