At 15:18 29/06/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
But I'm confident enough about my reading of the mail in my mailbox to say
that the chair is right in saying that ISO 11179 conformance was
considered by the WG (because Jefsey proposed it), and was rejected by the
WG as irrelevant.
Note: Jefsey's suspension on the ietf-languages list runs until July 15.
After that, I have to modify my killfile so that I see mail he sends to
that list. Until then, I see no reason why I should look at mail from him
at all.
Thank you for at last showing publicly and with authority that ad-hominems
are the answer given to the "dumb" idea that, WG-ltru and ISO dealing with
the same topic (ISO Tables registries), mutual innovative considerations
(and not only political lobbying) could help both. We, and all the people
involved, know this cannot be otherwise and may mean a loss of commercial
dominance over a significant part of the Internet.
We both think competition and free softwares foster better quality and
innovation. And cultural empowerment is the key to a common and sustainable
development. So, why?
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf