The list of "satisfied" is of ne real interest. The list of "disatistied"
seem important enough to say there is no consensus.
At 16:51 01/07/2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:29AM -0400, Ken Carlberg wrote:
> My view is that your impression of the reaction is incorrect. in
> taking the position that respondents can be classified as either:
> a) being satisfied with the IESG *decision*, b) dissatisfied or
> uncomfortable with the decision, or c) could not be clearly
> determined by the content of their response, I came up with the
> following list.
You can add me into the "Satisified" column". Note that sampling
messages posted to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org on this list will almost certainly
be
biased, since it is the people who are disasstified which are likely
going to be the ones complaining aobut it.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf