Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

While the availability and stability of the IETF infrastructure is
important, an engineering organization which declines to "eat its own
dog food" sends a message about its suitability for widespread
deployment.

Agreed.

--Jari


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", (continued) Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Joel Jaeggli Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Jeroen Massar Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Kevin Loch Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Ole Jacobsen Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand One and a half points (was: Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"), Spencer Dawkins Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Bill Sommerfeld Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Jari Arkko <= Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Eric A. Hall Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Richard Irving Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Brian E Carpenter Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", shogunx Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing", JORDI PALET MARTINEZ