On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:35:58 -0400
Melinda Shore <mshore(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 9/19/05 4:23 PM, "Harald Tveit Alvestrand"
<harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no> wrote:
I think all areas in the IETF are more-or-less defined as "core of the
area" + "what is closely linked to the core" + "what fits less badly there
than elsewhere" - ECRIT would come under "closely linked", since its
subject area is use of the SIP-type services; GEOPRIV might be more
characteristic of "fits less badly here than elsewhere" - it is used by
many of the services like ECRIT, but is also used (or should be) by WGs in
other areas.
I think there may be a problem here in that "real time" may
suggest to a number of people a level of rigor in timing that's
really not applicable to much of the work the new area is
It seems that on the Internet so called real time applications are
generally either
delay sensitive
and / or
Jitter intolerant. (Which are, of course, different things.)
I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture " (LLAI)
myself.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
intended to cover. I'm enthusiastic about the area;
not so crazy about its name.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf