At 23:05 19/09/2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture "
(LLAI) myself.
Do you conceptually accept in that wording that an OPES can be
plugged in there, for example as part of a service to the exchange?
The WG-OPES has worked on HTTP, and now on SMTP. IMHO OPES also fit
pseudo-synchronous exchanges. In that case the WG-OPES should be able
to dialog with the new area at a later stage.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf