From: bill(_at_)strahm(_dot_)net [mailto:bill(_at_)strahm(_dot_)net]
----- Forwarded message from Dean Anderson <dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com> -----
FYI: I am being threatened for posting operationally relevant
criticism of mis-operation of the F DNS Root server on the DNSOP
list.
--
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:55:20 -0700
From: David Kessens <david(_dot_)kessens(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com>
To: Dean Anderson <dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com>
Cc: David Meyer <dmm(_at_)1-4-5(_dot_)net>, Rob Austein
<sra(_at_)hactrn(_dot_)net>,
Bert Wijnen <bwijnen(_at_)lucent(_dot_)com>
Subject: [david(_dot_)kessens(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com: Re: [dnsop] An attack
that DNSSEC
would
have defended against...]
Dean,
To avoid any misunderstandings: My message is an official
warning to
you that I will propose to the IESG to remove your posting
privileges
if I see one more abusive mail from you.
Thanks,
David Kessens
---
Since I have been informed that this actually is the forum for this
discussion according to RFC 3683 I will ask for a
clarification from
David on this whole thing.
David, the way it reads to me is you warned Dean you would
go to the
IESG if he continued what you felt were abusive posts.
Dean in turn
informed the IESG of your warning because he felt it was
unwarranted
and being used by you as a tool to silence someone who had
a differing
technical opinion.
You
then used his complaint to the IESG as an instance of
another abusive
post and requested to have his privileges removed. Is that
basically correct?
If so are you telling me that I have to be afraid of ever voicing a
complaint or problem to the IESG because an AD can use that as a
reason for retribution? This to me transcends Dean and
whether or not
his posts are abusive - I'd like to know (maybe someone
else has the
answer) if I can be penalized for lodging a complaint with the IESG.
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
The way I see it - the answer is, under normal circumstances
NO. However, in the history of the IETF there have been
several cases where people go out of their way to send
unwarranted complaints to various ADs/IESG/IAB with
unwarranted claims.
If you were to do this more than a few times... Well, lets
just say crying wolf once isn't a foul - but after a couple
more times the town won't come out to see if there is a wolf
in the pasture.
Does that mean that if an AD's proposal to remove someone's posting
privileges fails to garner the required support that it was the AD who cried
wolf? And if not how come?
nick
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf