Harald,
Just out of curiosity : is there a symmetrical way to oppose a petition
like this one ? Or can arguments only be one-sided ?
I think such a petition page should contain several choices : approve,
disapprove, don't care,...
The way it is done on the page is heavily slanted towards approval of
the ban, and offers no way to oppose it. This is understandable because
it is partial, but partiality should not have a say when gathering
opinions that may ultimately result in collective action.
What we need is a tool to weight whether there is a significant majority
of people approving the ban, not one that tells us some people want it
(which will always be verified).
Regards,
Julien..
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
I have now finished my work on a petition explaining to the IESG why I
think Jefsey Morfin should be banned from posting on the IETF list
under RFC 3683.
--
Julien Maisonneuve 2.333
Alcanet 2101 1145 Alcatel HQ - Standardisation
Tel +33 1 4076 1145 54 rue la Boëtie, F-75008 Paris
Fax +33 1 4076 5912
Julien(_dot_)Maisonneuve(_at_)alcatel(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf