RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
2005-10-17 07:28:19
I very much doubt that this would be an issue in practice.
From an anti-censorship point of view I would much rather that the IETF
visit countries where the Internet is controlled.
I doubt for a moment that the authorities in any country would be so
obliging as to allow several thousand networking experts to map out
their security controls.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of "DENG, HUI -HCHBJ"
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:23 PM
To: Ole Jacobsen; Melinda Shore
Cc: jianping(_at_)cernet(_dot_)edu(_dot_)cn; Avri Doria;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; JORDI
PALET MARTINEZ; wuhq(_at_)catt(_dot_)ac(_dot_)cn
Subject: RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
- MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so
stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely
difficult for
some participant to attend.
- MUST NOT be held in a country with restrictions on freedom of
expression, especially if these extend to the blocking of
web sites
or any other censuring of personal communications.
- MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants would be
under pressure to support national technical policies on
threat of
imprisonment or other punitive actions, for their opinions.
- MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants
would need
government approval to attend.
The "restrictions on freedom of expression" is a little more
tricky and
one could argue that the IETF should not be in the business
of trying
to change policy at that level. China comes to mind as a
place we could
not go by this rule, but a lot of people seem to belive that
"constructive engagement" is more successful than boycott.
Please allow me speak something personally,
I come from Beijing China, continuously attended IETF
meeting six times. (freshman), hosted Chinese participants
parties each time. There are more than 40 chinese attendees
made a getting together in last IETF Paris Meeting right
after Technical Plenary on thursday.
This February, we hosted a workshop which is related to IETF
MIP6,MIP4, NEMO working group.
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip6/current/msg02353.html
In Feb. 2006, we are currently planing to continue to host
this workshop which is related to IETF more working groups.
If you are interested in help to bridge between IETF and China.
Please don't hesitate to contact with us.
Regarding to " Blocked sites, redirected dns, registration
and arrest of bloggers etc"
I already have to explain too many times with people who come
from IETF to China.
What I asked is just one question " Do you have any problem
to visit any website or using VPN in China".
The answer what I heard is just "No", What I recommend is
please come to China and see what she really is other than
judgement based on other'other'other peoples talking.
I understand some people who come from freedom country would
like to visit both "Anti-China website and terrorist", then
there will be not reachable, in that case what I can suggest
is " Please be patient just only 1 week (IETF meeting time),
after you return back to your freedom country, please
continue to do Anti-China acitivity as you like.
This weekend, Formula 1 will be held in Shanghai, China
http://www.formula1.com/
Next next week, 3GPP2 meeting will be held in Beijing, China.
Others like 3GPP, and ITU, OMA, IEEE intermediate meeting
were already held in China.
2008 Olmpic Game, Beijing, China
http://en.beijing-2008.org/33/28/homepage211612833.shtml
2010 World Expo, Shanghai, China
http://www.expo2010china.com/expo/english/eu/index.html
Then my question goes to "why IETF could not come to China?"
If IETF think that China is too poor and technology is pretty
lag behind, I agree and accept, but we chinese really
expected that more help could come from IETF to change ours life.
Shall we make a more "constructive engagement"
Thanks
-Hui
Disclaimer:
The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if any, are
confidential and may be protected by law against any
unauthorized use. If you have received this e-mail by
mistake or have reason to believe that you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail
as soon as possible and delete it from your computer system
immediately thereafter.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this
e-mail or attachment or disclose the contents to any other
person. While we have made every effort to keep our network
virus free, we take no responsibility for any computer virus
which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, (continued)
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, +ACI-DENG, HUI -HCHBJ+ACI-
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, +ACI-DENG, HUI -HCHBJ+ACI-
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, +ACI-DENG, HUI -HCHBJ+ACI-
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, Gray, Eric
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, +ACI-DENG, HUI -HCHBJ+ACI-
- RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip <=
- Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, john . loughney
- Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, Dave Crocker
RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, Ed Juskevicius
RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, Ed Juskevicius
|
|
|