Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but rather than
going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do you think p2p
protocol authors would have any motiviation to create a Security
Considerations section that would pass IESG review?
a security considerations section would be a breeze, compared to the
pre-chartering hoops we regularly impose on new areas of work, especially any
with a real security component, independent of prior work.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf