I agree here, Brian. Interoperabilty must be maintained. The issue is,
will China agree?
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
Ignore China?
No, that would be foolish.
We automatically ignore any pseudo-TLD that only exists within
a walled garden, because it is simply invisible outside.
It isn't part of the global Internet. If it appears in any
way outside the walled garden, it is meaningless.
I think there are a number of examples of this already.
IMHO, what we *should* do is think about how the related
requirement can be properly defined and how it can be
satisfied in the global Internet.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf