Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

ietf

Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

2006-08-18 10:03:38

You appear to beleive that the only reason someone might disagree with you is 
ignorance.


That's ridiculous.  Arrogance is another reason.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, (continued) Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Shane Amante Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore Message not available Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore knowing the technical background (was: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only), JFC Morfin Message not available Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Elwyn Davies RE: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Shah, Himanshu Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Noel Chiappa Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Keith Moore <= Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Date:	Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Previous by Thread:	Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:	Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]