On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:54:51PM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
No you are wrong Ted, and its pretty funny too. As it happens you are
incorrect for saying that this is inappropriate for the IETF's lists.
You need to dig farther into the WIPO Site and find all the State Signatures
to the Treaties - its them that the IETF is bound by whether it likes it or
not. Since the countries through with the IETF's actions operate including
the meetings, are all signatories to the WIPO Treaties you are exactly stuck
with them.
I said it was inappropraite for the IETF list. If you have specific
ideas as they relate to the ipr working group, feel free to be
specific about specific WIPO treaties that have resulted in national
legislation, and specific changes to be made to IETF's IPR policies,
feel free to make them on that list, but not on the main IETF list,
please.
Thanks,
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf