Steven M. Bellovin writes:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:26:33 -0500
John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
Perhaps we should make it a requirement that any document that is
Last Called must be associated with a mailing list, perhaps one
whose duration is limited to the Last Call period and any
follow-ups until the document is either published or finally
rejected. If there were a WG, then the WG list should be a proper
subset of that list, anyone commenting during the Last Call should
be added to it, and others could be added on request.
Actually, I think it's an excellent idea. Tracking Last Call comments
was always difficult, since the email tended to end up in several
different folders and wasn't archived elsewhere.
I wish something like this had been in place a year ago. People sent
last call comments I needed to read to five different lists (IIRC), and
I subscribed to only to three of those.
But it could be less bothersome than having to set up a specific list.
Just require that the draft specifies where comments should go and
mention the address in the Last Call announcement.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf