Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu> writes:
Hi. I'm sitting here reviewing changes to a document to see if I can
last call it.
As part of a response to AD review comments, one of the references
were changed. This document uses numeric references. Starting at
reference 16, everything was renumbered. That makes the diff a pain.
For this and many other reasons, I strongly encourage people to avoid
numeric references in their documents.
That makes sense, but I believe the default for the xml2rfc tool is to
produce numeric references. Does xml2rfc support symbolic references?
If the defaults in xml2rfc is changed to symbolic references, I think
we'd see that a lot of documents would adopt the new approach.
/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf