Re: In support of symbolic references

ietf

Re: In support of symbolic references

2007-04-06 00:27:58

On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:

Simon,

Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.

+1

(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)


Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
bad idea. If you want to suggest a change in the default,
writing to xml2rfc(_at_)lists(_dot_)xml(_dot_)resource(_dot_)org is a good 
first move.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
In support of symbolic references, Sam Hartman Re: In support of symbolic references, Simon Josefsson Re: In support of symbolic references, Steven M. Bellovin Re: In support of symbolic references, Simon Josefsson Re: In support of symbolic references, Steven M. Bellovin Re: In support of symbolic references, Jari Arkko Re: In support of symbolic references, Brian E Carpenter <= Re: In support of symbolic references, Elwyn Davies Re: In support of symbolic references, Francis Dupont RE: In support of symbolic references, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\) Re: In support of symbolic references, John C Klensin RE: In support of symbolic references, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 Re: In support of symbolic references, Bill Fenner Message not available Re: In support of symbolic references, Michael StJohns Re: In support of symbolic references, Dave Cridland Message not available Re: In support of symbolic references, Dave Crocker Re: In support of symbolic references, Julian Reschke

Previous by Date:	Re: In support of symbolic references, Jari Arkko
Next by Date:	Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten
Previous by Thread:	Re: In support of symbolic references, Jari Arkko
Next by Thread:	Re: In support of symbolic references, Elwyn Davies
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]