Re: In support of symbolic references

 In his previous mail Jari wrote:

   > Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
   +1
   
   (I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
   Klensin's concern.)
   
=> +1 too

Francis(_dot_)Dupont(_at_)fdupont(_dot_)fr

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
In support of symbolic references, Sam Hartman Re: In support of symbolic references, Simon Josefsson Re: In support of symbolic references, Steven M. Bellovin Re: In support of symbolic references, Simon Josefsson Re: In support of symbolic references, Steven M. Bellovin Re: In support of symbolic references, Jari Arkko Re: In support of symbolic references, Brian E Carpenter Re: In support of symbolic references, Elwyn Davies Re: In support of symbolic references, Francis Dupont <= RE: In support of symbolic references, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\) Re: In support of symbolic references, John C Klensin RE: In support of symbolic references, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 Re: In support of symbolic references, Bill Fenner Message not available Re: In support of symbolic references, Michael StJohns Re: In support of symbolic references, Dave Cridland Message not available Re: In support of symbolic references, Dave Crocker Re: In support of symbolic references, Julian Reschke Re: In support of symbolic references, John C Klensin Re: In support of symbolic references, Bob Braden