Sorry for the complete change in subject, but I think it's important
to avoid confusion here:
On 1 dec 2007, at 12:22, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Disclaimer, I like Excel
on boxes where it's available, it's a nice product. But it's
not nice enough to say that 1900-02-29 was day 60 in year 0,
if that's what the 6000 ooXML pages say (I only looked at some
nits in the BSI Wiki, I never read any page of the huge draft).
What are you trying to say here?
There never was a februari 29 in 1900 so giving that non-existant day
a number would be problematic. From your statement, I assume there is
a standard that does this, but I'm not sure which one and why. Could
you enlighten us?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf