Dear IESG,
The call for comments didn't include a destination for those comments, but
since people are already responding on-list, I agree with Brian. My only
suggestion is to use IONs more frequently.
I hope that the upcoming "successful BOF" RFC is also published as an ION,
for example, because I hope that there will be updates that reflect the
recently-approved RFC 5111 ("Experiment in Exploratory Group Formation
within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)").
Thanks,
Spencer
On 2008-01-17 09:30, Frank Ellermann wrote:
The IESG wrote:
Have IONs been valuable? Should we continue to make use of
this mechanism?
Yes and yes.
I'm biased, having helped to start this experiment, but my only
criticism is that we haven't made enough use of it (i.e. there
are a number of IETF procedural documents that are ripe for
republishing as IONs). So, +1 for yes and yes.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf