On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:30:27AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:00:23AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Ned Freed wrote:
If the consensus is that better interoperability can be had
by banning bare AAAA records that's perfectly fine with me.
FWIW, I'd like that...
Clarity can be established and interoperability _improved_
by limiting discovery to just A and MX records. Perhaps a
note might be included that at some point in the future MX
records may become required.
Again, I have no problem with this approach if that's what
the consensus is.
...and that, too.
so what is supposed to happen when I remove all
"A" RR's from my zones?
The same thing that happens today with zones that don't
have A records. You use MX records to refer to machines
that have address (A and/or AAAA) records.
er... what about zones w/ A & AAAA rr's and no MX's?
when I pull the A rr's, you are telling me that SMTP
stops working? That is so broken.
--bill
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET:
Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
--
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf