At 00:27 26-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote:
what this daft is trying to do is force the presumptive
existance of an MX in a zone into an explict rule that
forces the existance of an MX, else SMTP fails.
That's not what Section 5.1 (Locating the Target Host) of the draft says.
At 19:31 25-03-2008, Bill Manning wrote:
example.com. soa (
mailhost aaaa fe80::21a:92ff:fe99:2ab1
is what i am using today.
The above will work. This is considered as a MX with a preference of
0 pointing to mailhost.example.com.
IETF mailing list