Hi -
From: "Ned Freed" <ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com>
To: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik(_at_)levkowetz(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Ned Freed" <ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on Spam Control on IETF Mailing Lists
...
And there's that word "automatically". There is nothing in the text that says
such arrangements have to be automatic.
...
I have the same problem with the text. It says:
* IETF mailing lists MUST provide a mechanism for legitimate technical
participants to bypass moderation, challenge-response, or other techniques
that would interfere with a prompt technical debate on the mailing list
without requiring such participants to receive list traffic.
The stated requirement is that it must not "interfere with a prompt
technical debate". Clearly, that rules out anything requiring human
intervention. What do you have in mind that would allow the
spammer^H^H^H^H^H^H^H participant to post without subscribing
and without interacting with a chair or list administrator?
Randy
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf