ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed IESG Statement Regarding RFC Errata for IETF Sream RFCs

2008-04-16 10:12:19
I support adoption of these proposed guidelines, but have a couple of minor 
comments...


   After an erratum is reported, a report will be sent to the authors and

   Area Directors (ADs) of the WG in which it originated.  If the WG has
   closed or the document was not associated with a WG, then the
   report will be sent to the ADs for the Area most closely associated
   to the subject matter.

If the document was produced by a WG that is not closed, the report should 
be copied to the WG chairs as well.

   5.  Ugly typos that are clearly bogus typos but would not cause any
       confusions to implementation or deployments should be Archived.

The intent here is reasonable, but IMHO it's kind of poorly expressed.
I'd suggest "Clear typographical errors which would not cause...".




-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf