ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed IESG Statement Regarding RFC Errata for IETF Sream RFCs

2008-04-17 13:04:03

One of the guidelines says:

  8.  Changes that modify the working of a process, such as changing
      an IANA registration procedure, to something that might be
      different from the intended consensus when the document was
      approved should be Archived.

I do not understand an errata that suggests changing the defined
process should be Archived.  Shouldn't this be flat out Rejected?

The intent was for the proposed change (submitted as an errata) to be 
considered if the document ever gets revised.

Russ

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>