Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Seems good to me. Will the "archived" and "rejected" errata
be visible to the public? I think that should be mentioned.
Ideally the IESG procedure is integrated in the errata draft
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rfc-editor-errata-process>
and published as RFC (it could be even a BCP).
BTW, "errata" is a plural noun. The singular is "erratum."
But we rarely get away with the singular... ;-)
Frank
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf