Re: BCP or RFC references2008-08-14 08:39:19--On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:36 PM -0400 Tony Hansen <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote: I think it would be better to use phrasing like this: BCP 32 (currently RFC 2606) And that, of course, has yet a different meaning, although probably nearly the same one as the "2606 and successors" version does. john _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
|