Re: BCP or RFC references

--On Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:36 PM -0400 Tony Hansen 
<tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I think it would be better to use phrasing like this:
>
>         BCP 32 (currently RFC 2606)
And that, of course, has yet a different meaning, although 
probably nearly the same one as the "2606 and successors" 
version does.
   john




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf