John C Klensin wrote:
I continue to believe that the IESG could do something much easier
and much more effective by issuing, not a collection of new rules,
but a simple statement requiring that people either use
suitably-reserved and dedicated identifiers or that they explain,
explicitly and subject to community review, why not.
I think that's pretty much what we tried to do, but apparently,
the text doesn't quite read that way (and I agree that it's quite
long).
Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf