Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

If the IETF chooses to ignore the FSF, I don't think that strategy will work.


It's worked for the past 20 years.  What's different now?

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: References to Redphone's "patent", (continued) RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Lawrence Rosen RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Contreras, Jorge Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Harald Alvestrand Message not available RE: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Paul Hoffman Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Lawrence Rosen Message not available Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Paul Hoffman Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Thierry Moreau Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Doug Ewell Message not available Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael Dillon Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine <= Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, TSG RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, Michael B. Einschlag Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board, John Levine Settlement proposal - Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy, TSG Message not available Re: Previous consensus on not changing patent policy (Re: References to Redphone's "patent"), Theodore Tso Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Scott Brim RE: References to Redphone's "patent", Hallam-Baker, Phillip IPR advice to avoid ignorant flame wars about patents, Lawrence Rosen Re: References to Redphone's "patent", Noel Chiappa