ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

2009-07-06 06:46:29
Melinda Shore wrote:
...
I don't think that the second part of your assertion is correct.  I'm
not trying to be difficult. I introduce by example the huge number of
mobile devices that handle HTML effortlessly and IETF legacy ASCII not
at all.

I've never run into a device that can't display ASCII at
all (if it can display HTML it can display plain ASCII), but

Some EBook readers, as far as I recall, display XHTML fine, but do not display plain text. And even if they do, you will encounter the line wrap problem.

have used and owned a large number of devices that can't
display HTML.  Plus, there appears to be a certain amount
of whimsy involved with rendering HTML and displays can be
inconsistent, which 1) is one of the complaints about the
current format, and 2) is undesirable for the display of
technical specifications.
...

Of course that depends on the type of HTML we would use. For instance, if you get inconsistent results with the HTML my XSLT variant of xml2rfc produces, please let me know (example: <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html>).

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>