Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada dot com> wrote:
If we really want to make progress here it's not going to happen by
reaching rough consensus after a long discussion, but by a (very)
small group of people getting together and coming up with something
that improves upon the current situation for (pretty much) everyone,
rather than optimize for one particular way to interpret the state of
the universe.
But as John pointed out, this isn't going to happen unless that group
can focus on what "the current situation" refers to, and try to solve
one problem at a time, and stop pretending that ASCII vs. Unicode and
fixed vs. floating line breaks and ASCII art vs. bitmapped/vector
graphics and "which tool is best" are all the same issue.
--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf