I created an xml2rfc template, like those available on xml.resource.org,
which I copy and modify for new drafts, and use the web version of the
tool - and everything works well enough for me.
I'm decidedly not picky about formatting, because I want to spend my
time contributing content.
Because sometimes the error messages can be cryptic, when modifying the
XML tags, I frequently submit the document and generate HTML in order to
bound the number of XML tags that can contribute to a problem.
- Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Tim Bray
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:26 AM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum; IETF Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two
different threads - IETF Document Format)
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Lars
Eggert<lars(_dot_)eggert(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com>
wrote:
since you asked: I have absolutely no problems with xml2rfc.
I used to edit in nroff, which wasn't compatible with my brain, and I
used Joe's Word template, which works OK, but I prefer something
ASCII-based for collaborative editing (for svn, diff, etc.)
I'm fully open to trying something new once someone creates a
different
("better") tool, but until then, xml2rfc is OK.
What Lars said. -T
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf