Hi,
I am baffled why this announcement, of fundamental importance,
was not sent to the correct list for IETF announcements.
The same applies to the original announcement, sent as I
understand it on 23 June, at a time when I wasn't reading
the discussion list for personal reasons.
I will comment substantively when I've had a chance to
read through the proposal and John's appeal. However, I
would suggest that the announcement should be sent
to the IETF announcement list, and that the one month
comment period should start again at that point.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf