ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

2009-09-11 11:30:05
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Noel Chiappa wrote:
    > From: Stephan Wenger <stewe(_at_)stewe(_dot_)org>

    > For the IETF as an organization, I see no value beyond traditions in
    > staying with the RFC publication model. (The marketing value of using
    > the RFC series is IMHO contradicted by the lack of control of the IETF
    > over the RFC series).

If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting creating a new document
series for use by the IETF, for its standards documents?  If so, I don't
recall this possibility being discussed before, although I can't believe it
hasn't been suggested at some point.

Well, there's STDs. Do you also want PSTD and DSTD numbers?

Such a change would be acceptable to me - although it might take a while to
build up the distribution system that already exists for RFCs.

Using STD/DSTD/PSTD would just be additional numbers.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqqbLsACgkQE5f5cImnZrv5WwCg58JSLLQTkOPBJWZzkNx8HyDJ
ahkAn2O/m6u2U6jUTxybaR1myDUEwscm
=2c62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf