ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

2009-09-09 13:21:39
    > From: Stephan Wenger <stewe(_at_)stewe(_dot_)org>

    > For the IETF as an organization, I see no value beyond traditions in
    > staying with the RFC publication model. (The marketing value of using
    > the RFC series is IMHO contradicted by the lack of control of the IETF
    > over the RFC series).

If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting creating a new document
series for use by the IETF, for its standards documents?  If so, I don't
recall this possibility being discussed before, although I can't believe it
hasn't been suggested at some point.

Such a change would be acceptable to me - although it might take a while to
build up the distribution system that already exists for RFCs.

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf