Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 12/1/09 7:49 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
7. 6.2 says: "If servers wish to <<avoid attack>> they MUST
NOT <<do stuff>>" Isn't that equivalent to servers SHOULD
NOT? I think a SHOULD NOT is better. (And that's the form
used in section 7.)
MUST NOT -> must not
The sentence is not an applicability/requirement statement. It is a
statement containing fact in the real world.
Bob Braden
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf