On 2010-01-11, at 14:52, Dean Willis
<dean(_dot_)willis(_at_)softarmor(_dot_)com> wrote:
Unlike the US, whose border-liabilities are fairly well understood
by IETFers,
Seriously? I cross the US-Canada border all the time, and I'm a
citizen of both countries, and I can still barely keep up with the
constant, apparently random revocations niggly little details of local
conventions at each crossing since last I crossed there. That people
whose native language isn't English are totally flummoxed by the US
rules is amply demonstrated to me every time I enter the US. Not to
mention US citizens who cannot _believe_ that these rules apply to them.
I don't want to get into a (IMO fatuous) debate about which
geopolitical arrangement is more troubling than others. I merely want
to point out that it's just nonsense to use the current US conventions
as an example of those obviously well understood.
--
Andrew Sullivan
<ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf