Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Subject: RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) Date: Wed, Jan 
20, 2010 at 10:09:18PM +0100 Quoting Ingemar Johansson S 
(ingemar(_dot_)s(_dot_)johansson(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com):


> So our interpretation of such proposed phased approach is that the WG
> would be explicitely taking a decision to pursue the work if there are
> no standardized codecs out there fullfilling the requirements. 
My interpretation of the situation is that this milestone is in most
peoples rear-view mirror. The available codecs that could be
rubberstamped are all missing some of the desirable qualities, ie
internetability, licensing, sound quality, latency.

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
I feel partially hydrogenated!

pgplDb5t2ryQw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf