Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)

Chuckle? Not really. This is depressing. So maybe the IETF should smile
and stand back politely.

   Brian

On 2010-02-23 14:05, Jeff Wheeler (jewheele) wrote:
>  actually in the DMTF Telco WG we're completing a 3-month study of the 
> metrics and data artifacts used by the various SDOs, consortia and forum 
> currently involved in their own formal cloud standards and the count is 27, 
> that without the vendors inter-cloud management interfaces.
>
> chuckle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
> [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:45 PM
> To: Scott Brim
> Cc: Ole Jacobsen (ole); ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; clouds(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; 
> dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; David Chadwick
> Subject: Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, 
> CA)
>
> > If you're proposing OGF you should look at the 6 or 7 other SDOs doing 
> > useful work on clouds, e.g. the DMTF.  It's a complex situation.
> I would have said "ridiculous" actually.  So much standards energy, so little 
> shipping technology. -Tim _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf