On 06/09/2010 01:19 PM, ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
And so, having no other argument to make, we resort to pejoratives?
Calling small business use of a small number of IPv4 addresses
"anachronistic"
doesn't change the fact that this is a widespread practice fully
supported by
an ample number of reasonable quality router products. And you're not
going to
get IPv6 deployed in such cases without a drop-in replacement that adds
IPv6
support to what's already there.
this is cute ned but your assertion that this device can't route for a
interior public prefix was just plain wrong. perhaps you should actually
get one and try it?
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf