ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The anonymity question

2010-07-26 23:07:05
Joel Jaeggli wrote:

On 7/25/10 6:21 AM, Fred Baker wrote:

A person's identity and their behavior are two different things. I
would presume that every IETF working group or BOF list has at least
one person on it who is lurking in the discussion for the purpose of
filing a frivolous lawsuit later. Not sure how we can prevent that.

lurking does not in our definition amount to a contribution.

"Lurking", i.e. to watch (monitor) what is going on in IETF working groups
is designed to be anonymous.  RFC, I-Ds and mailing list archives do
not require any authentication or subscription.  If they did, things
would no longer be public, but instead membership-only (even if
membership does not require a fee and is open to the public).

Btw. if a person, by his/her own free will decides to publish something
through IETF channels (e.g. on an IETF mailing list, during a WG session
at an IETF meeting or by submitting an I-D), then this is a whole
different kind of PII information than payment data collected
by the IETF (secretariat or whoever handles the payments when registering
for an IETF meeting).


-Martin

PS: you do not need to create an publish a privacy policy before you
    can purchase and read Bill Clintons autobiography, neither as
    a private person, nor as a (representative of) coporate entity.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>