At 06:15 AM 7/30/2010, Aaron Falk wrote:
On 7/30/10 9:46 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>
>> Just to add my two cents to this discussion from a (past) noncom
chair perpsective, having more experienced IETF participants on the
Nomcom helps tremendously. It makes it far easier for the noncom
chair and non-voting members (previous nomcom chair and liaisons)
to stick to the roles as specified in RFC 3777 in terms of
facilitatng and ensuring the integrity of the process and not
influencing the decisions of the nomcom. In the end, each voting
member gets one vote (using a methodology agreed by the voting
members), so the positives of ensuring the nomcom has experienced
members far outweigh any perceived negatives in my experience.
>>
>
> I was discussing this with various people yesterday - maybe it
would be useful to have a "moving average" NOMCOM, with a two year
term, and 50% replacement each year. Once that was set up, I think
that the need for experienced hands would diminish - one year on
the NOMCOM seems to be quite a bit of experience.
I don't think Mary is talking about members with previous nomcom
experience but rather more IETF experience. I agree. In fact, why
should we have nomcom members with little IETF experience picking
our leadership?
I agree completely on this point, even if it means having a 2-tiered
system of half the current 3-of-5 meetings, and have (something like)
10-of-15 (or more) meetings.
it's a thought (that goes to what Aaron is talking about)
James
--aaron
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf