Re: IETF Attendance by continent

And even closer to 3:2:2 ?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu>
To: "Noel Chiappa" <jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: IETF Attendance by continent


> > > > > > "Noel" == Noel Chiappa <jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu> writes:
>    >> I suspect that a more nuanced analysis would have this as "1.7 and
>    >> shrinking : 1 and stable : 1 and stable".
>
>    Noel> and his conclusion:
>
>    >> I would support 2:1:1 for the present, with an intention to review 
> that
>    >> in 2-3 years.
>
>    Noel> seems to me to be right on, given those 1.7:1:1 numbers - 1.7 is 
> closer to 2
>    Noel> than it is to 1...
>
> +1
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf