> From: Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
> On 8/26/2010 2:08 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> Thank you for providing this but this data seems to support something
>> closer to 2-1-1 than 1-1-1
> I took there to be a reasonable consensus from that that 1-1-1 made the
> most sense.
I dunno, I though Fred nailed it exactly, myself:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> the numbers today are reported to be roughly 1.7:1:1
> ...
> I suspect that a more nuanced analysis would have this as "1.7 and
> shrinking : 1 and stable : 1 and stable".
and his conclusion:
> I would support 2:1:1 for the present, with an intention to review that
> in 2-3 years.
seems to me to be right on, given those 1.7:1:1 numbers - 1.7 is closer to 2
than it is to 1...
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf