On 8/30/10 1:53 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 30 aug 2010, at 21.46, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
I also feel that 3:2:2 is about the right ratio.
Actually, the correct ratio is pi:e:sqrt(2). Furthermore, one can
prove that, given enough IETFs, we can converge to this close
enough that we'll be within _everyone's_ error margin!
I was expecting something like:
pi:e:sqrt(-1)
Given the irrationality this topic evokes, that seems about right. ;-)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf