ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: what is the problem bis

2010-10-26 17:13:00

"Eliot" == Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> writes:
    >> The downside of Russ's draft is that it is possible that after
    >> approving it we might find that nothing changes: Protocol
    >> specifications still stay at Proposed Standard; The IESG still
    >> takes a lot of time in approving a request to publish a proposed
    >> standard RFC.

    Eliot> How will we measure effect?  And what other factors need to
    Eliot> be controlled?

The obvious measure of number of IDs->PS is interesting.

But, perhaps the average length of time for ID-00 -> PS is more
important, overall to the entire discussion.  That number needs to
additionally have a time point of WG LC, move to IESG and also IETF LC.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ottawa(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca 
http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
                       then sign the petition. 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>