Re: what is the problem bis

Actually, my heartache with Russ' proposal is the automatic "If it's Draft, 
it's now Standard."

I would be quite happy with Proposed and Internet Standard, with NO 
grandfathering.

On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Ofer Inbar wrote:

> On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> > I'm a fan of reducing down to 2 levels, too.  But it has nothing to
> > do with how overblown the effort to get to Proposed is.  (Well,
> I feel like we already have a 2-level system.
>
> What's the practical difference between Proposed and full Standard?
>
> It may take a lot of effort to make that jump, but what difference
> does it make outside of the fact that the document now has a new
> label?  Who notices or cares about the distinction?  Does it affect
> anything real?
>
> These aren't rhetorical questions.  I feel like there's no practical
> effect, but I may be wrong, and I'm asking.
>  -- Cos
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf