ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

2011-07-05 09:59:31
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Keith Moore 
<moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>wrote:

Is the reasoning behind the decision explained somewhere? My reading of
the threads on the subject in v6ops was that the opposition to 6to4-historic
was a small but vocal minority, and I thought that qualified as rough
consensus.

Even if there was rough consensus within v6ops, rough consensus of v6ops
does not equate to rough consensus of the entire IETF community.


And who says that "rough consensus of the entire IETF community" is that
this draft should not be published? Were there public discussions to that
effect that came to this conclusion?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf