On 23 Sep 2011, at 7:21 , Benson Schliesser wrote:
The STS may have similar
semantics as RFC1918 space, in that it's non-routable on the Internet etc.
But it is not meant to be used in the same scope.
The draft isn't sufficiently clear on this to my liking.
I think it should be explicitly stated that no services are to be hosted on
addresses in this prefix.
There is no support for the choice for a /10. Why not a /11 or a /9?
There is no discussion on the consequences of filtering packets to/from these
addresses, such as PMTUD black holes.
Hosting the reverse DNS for these addresses within the prefix may or may not be
useful.
Did anyone try to talk to holders of legacy space that is not present in the
global routing table, such as the US government, to see if their addresses can
be reused for this purpose?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf