ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anotherj RFP without IETF community input (was: Re: RFP for Remote Participation Services Specifications Development)

2011-10-20 05:02:22


--On Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:49 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

+1

Two "it's only me" observations:  What some mobile
broadband providers euphemistically sell as "ISDN"-
speed in Germany and what Microsoft claims to be a
"media player" is a major PIT* with whatever the
IETF considers as "audio streaming".

If there are good jabber scribes not assuming that
"audio" remotely works or is related to their side
of "real time" remote jabber participation can be
fun.  Even if jabber doesn't work very well there
are often at least interesting jabber logs.

And the time-lag differences among the IETF audio stream, other
audio arrangements (WebEx, Skype, etc.), and the jabber activity
can be seriously crazy-making.  I didn't intend my examples to
be comprehensive, only to illustrate that it is important to
talk with users.   Thanks, Frank, for adding to the list.

   john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf